Originally posted at http://www.hastac.org/blogs/sarahr/vast-world-vast-narratives-fandom-and-participatory-culture on March 22, 2010
What makes a narrative vast, according to the contributors to the recent MIT volume Third Person? Based on the varied content, spread across multiple media, covered by the book, vast narratives receive their designation not only due to the interior nature of the narrative, which may span unusual lengths when measured in years, amount of content produced, number of media in which the world is present, among other features (Harrigan and Wardrip-Fruin 2).
Yet the volume is also vast, as in catholic, given its broad interpretation of what constitutes a narrative: consider outsider artist/author Henry Darger‘s inclusion alongside other constructed worlds and universes of comic books (Ford and Jenkins), traditional paper and pen gaming (Laws), video games, television programs whose mythologies extend beyond the reach of traditional broadcast and into transmedia, such as in the case of Lost (Lavery). (In the interest of full disclosure: Lost is of particular interest to me at present, as I only discovered it last semester, watching five seasons on Netflix while I read about the show elsewhere.)
Alternate reality games bridge the Lost world beyond the confines of the original television medium, endless clues and the constant suggestion of deeper meaning in the shows symbols, comic book-like world and story building with some characters reading comic books on the show allowing viewers a sense of interactivity with/in the narrative. Is a fantasy or sci-fi setting more easily adaptable to a vast narrative? Is it because of the pliability of the rules, so to speak, of physics, time, space and who can populate the narratives in these genres? Is it due to the relative rigidity of their Dorothy-like structure – Oz vs. Alice’s Wonderland (Bartle)? Is it some combination of the two?
These settings and protocols have begun to seep into our understandings of possibility and potentiality for narrative structure, as well as what is doable (Bartle 107). They have developed into understood sets of rules that become so entrenched in cultural material that they are no longer questioned or their origins, traced. Purchase a new fantasy game for Xbox or PS3 and be asked to create a character who is a magic user, fighter, or healer. Choose armor and weapons and prepare for a quest after learning about the characters world and its complex culture and mythology. These processes are routine and mundane, and the masses have now become conversant in their operation, mechanisms and tropes
It seems a relative few who would be interested in (or possess requisite knowledge for) tracing the lineage of this system of narrative creation back to its origins: in D&D (with D&D in turn, able to trace its lineage back to the epic world-building and storytelling of the Tolkein universe, and so on). Yet just as narratives become more gamelike, games gain greater narrative structure, their worlds expand and they feel epic. Limited “setting” yields to immense “universe,” complete with history, culture, language and minutiae that might seem inconsequential to outsiders, but, to initiates, has great meaning.
Indeed, as author Robin Laws points out, gamers love detail”(60). In the realm of vast narratives, viewers, readers and players converge into one: the fan. In fact, fandom is frequently a feature of contemporary vast narratives, perhaps due to the characteristic of such narratives to provide just the level of detail, and commitment, that these viewers/readers/gamers/fans love. One visit alone to Lostpedia or similar sites ought to be proof enough of this assertion.
Fandom provides another appealing element to the follower of contemporary vast narratives: the ability to participate. Generating new entries in Lostpedia, playing along with an alternate reality game, embodying a character within a superhero game universe, or authoring a pen-and-paper RPG campaign all allow the fan to move from simple consumption to active participation/production within the confines of the narratives world. The desire to create original narratives can also drive fans of ones that already exist to build their own. One mid-1980s computer title from Electronic Arts, the Adventure Construction Set, fulfilled this particular desire; in this case, the building of a new vast narrative, populated with quests, characters, classes, objectives, was, in and of itself, the game.
Will the “vast narrative” prove a useful unit of analysis for literature, media, games and culture studies scholars (among others)? Time will be the ultimate arbiter of the question, although it is undeniable that this term does begin to chip away at a genre-bending important but heretofore largely unstudied commonality that so many of these works share. Their sheer size, richness, detail, and the interactivity and commitment they engender are worthy of thought, particularly in an age when, on the one hand, we voluntarily immerse ourselves in the ongoing narratives of these works while simultaneously challenging ourselves to the restrictions imposed by Twitter and other short-blast media. Whatever the outcome of future study, an examination of the nature of the vast narrative will undoubtedly result in new connections being drawn across the boundaries of media and disciplines and will offer a better knowing of those of us whose labor and imaginations create them or who may simply be enticed to venture in to explore.
Harrigan, Pat, and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. Third Person: Authoring and Exploring Vast Narratives. The MIT Press, 2009.